PlaneteCasio
/
libc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 6 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Tue Sep 11 21:22:00 2001 Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hotmail.com> 

* thread.cc (pthread_cond::~pthread_cond): Bugfix: Incorrect use of InterlockExchangePointer.
	(pthread_mutex::~pthread_mutex): Ditto.
	(semaphore::~semaphore): Ditto.
This commit is contained in:
Robert Collins 2001-09-11 11:23:41 +00:00
parent f9229ef74b
commit 24a930fa23
2 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
winsup/cygwin/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
Tue Sep 11 21:22:00 2001 Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hotmail.com>
* thread.cc (pthread_cond::~pthread_cond): Bugfix: Incorrect use of InterlockExchangePointer.
(pthread_mutex::~pthread_mutex): Ditto.
(semaphore::~semaphore): Ditto.
Tue Sep 11 18:15:00 2001 Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hotmail.com>
* dcrt0.cc (cygwin_finished_initializing): Copy _mtinterf on fork;

19
winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
View File

@ -444,14 +444,14 @@ pthread_cond::~pthread_cond ()
pthread_mutex_destroy (&cond_access);
/* I'm not 100% sure the next bit is threadsafe. I think it is... */
if (MT_INTERFACE->conds == this)
MT_INTERFACE->conds = (pthread_cond *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->conds, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->conds, this->next);
else
{
pthread_cond *tempcond = MT_INTERFACE->conds;
while (tempcond->next && tempcond->next != this)
tempcond = tempcond->next;
/* but there may be a race between the loop above and this statement */
tempcond->next = (pthread_cond *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempcond->next, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempcond->next, this->next);
}
}
@ -595,13 +595,6 @@ pthread_key::get ()
*Isn't duplicated, it's reopened.
*/
/*FIXME: implement InterlockExchangePointer and get rid of the silly typecasts in pthread_atfork
*/
#ifndef InterlockedExchangePointer
#define InterlockedExchangePointer InterlockedExchange
#endif
pthread_mutex::pthread_mutex (pthread_mutexattr *attr):verifyable_object (PTHREAD_MUTEX_MAGIC)
{
/*attr checked in the C call */
@ -629,14 +622,14 @@ pthread_mutex::~pthread_mutex ()
win32_obj_id = NULL;
/* I'm not 100% sure the next bit is threadsafe. I think it is... */
if (MT_INTERFACE->mutexs == this)
MT_INTERFACE->mutexs = (pthread_mutex *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->mutexs, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->mutexs, this->next);
else
{
pthread_mutex *tempmutex = MT_INTERFACE->mutexs;
while (tempmutex->next && tempmutex->next != this)
tempmutex = tempmutex->next;
/* but there may be a race between the loop above and this statement */
tempmutex->next = (pthread_mutex *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempmutex->next, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempmutex->next, this->next);
}
}
@ -700,14 +693,14 @@ semaphore::~semaphore ()
CloseHandle (win32_obj_id);
/* I'm not 100% sure the next bit is threadsafe. I think it is... */
if (MT_INTERFACE->semaphores == this)
MT_INTERFACE->semaphores = (semaphore *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->semaphores, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&MT_INTERFACE->semaphores, this->next);
else
{
semaphore *tempsem = MT_INTERFACE->semaphores;
while (tempsem->next && tempsem->next != this)
tempsem = tempsem->next;
/* but there may be a race between the loop above and this statement */
tempsem->next = (semaphore *)InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempsem->next, this->next);
InterlockedExchangePointer (&tempsem->next, this->next);
}
}