From c338bc22554fcddf64f12148785d07c1a4021160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Wilson Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:38:01 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Don't call double rint from float powf. Updated patch to use 0.0f in addition to calling rintf. Tested same way as before, with a testcase that triggers the code and make check. OK? newlib/ * libm/math/wf_pow.c (powf): Call rintf instead of rint. Use 0.0f for compare. --- newlib/libm/math/wf_pow.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/newlib/libm/math/wf_pow.c b/newlib/libm/math/wf_pow.c index be453558b..9a10254bf 100644 --- a/newlib/libm/math/wf_pow.c +++ b/newlib/libm/math/wf_pow.c @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ if (_LIB_VERSION == _SVID_) { exc.retval = HUGE; y *= 0.5; - if(x<0.0&&rint(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE; + if(x<0.0f&&rintf(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE; } else { exc.retval = HUGE_VAL; y *= 0.5; - if(x<0.0&&rint(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE_VAL; + if(x<0.0f&&rintf(y)!=y) exc.retval = -HUGE_VAL; } if (_LIB_VERSION == _POSIX_) errno = ERANGE;